Episode 4
The Last Place
on Earth

Written & directed by
ADRIAN REDMOND

Production number 601-101D
Filmed in Alaska 1998-2000
Post production in Denmark 2001
Duration 51 minutes (English version)
Stereo PAL and NTSC


Non-broadcast release on VHS and DVD
Also available
in Danish and Greenlandic
 
Living with the consequences
 
With the passing of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act in 1971, the way was open for the construction of the Trans Alaska pipeline and with it the exploitation of the huge oil reserves of the North Slope. 

The search for new oil deposits continued and soon Prudhoe Bay was heralded as the greatest oil reserve in the United States.
The impact of industrial development was felt quickly by communities throughout Alaska as thousands of construction workers - primarily from the lower 48 states - descended on Alaska in pursuit of employment and wealth. Alaska's communities - particularly the rural Native communities, were unprepared for the scale and tempo with which development and the growth of a cash economy would take place.
 
Whilst the oil industry and many construction companies had promised to create permanent employment for Alaska's Natives, few long-term jobs were actually realized. When the construction boom was over, the Natives had to adapt to a new world - one in which the cash economy was increasingly important, despite the lack of employment opportunities for the Native population.
 
The Native-owned ANCSA corporations took up the challenge, amongst them the Athabascan Indian regional corporation Doyon, which established a drilling company in direct competition with experienced rig operators on the North Slope. Within two decades, Doyon Drilling has become the most successful rig operator in Alaska, with one of the best Native hire track records on the North Slope, and boasts a performance and safety record which is renowned throughout the oil industry.
Following the enactment of ANCSA, Alaska's Natives embraced development because they had few viable political or economic alternatives. Likewise living conditions in bush Alaska in the 60's and early 70's were lagging far behind the standards of living conditions and public services enjoyed by citizens elsewhere in urban America. The Natives placed their faith and trust in the ability of the industrial world to respect and protect their natural resources at the same time as exploiting them for profit.
 
Such faith was severely undermined when, in 1989,  the oil tanker Exxon Valdez ran aground in Prince William Sound, causing an oil spill the effects of which have not completely subsided over 10 years later. 

The Exxon Valdez disaster contains important lessons for industrial societies all over the world.
The story of industrial development in the Alaskan Arctic is one of both great opportunity and frightening pitfalls - two sides of the same coin - which illustrate that industrial development is possible anywhere in the world - but not without a price to be paid, often by the Native population and their natural environment.

The Native Claims Settlement Act changes Native Alaska irrevocably. Despite all the benefits which have accrued from the act, the development which followed it divided Native society in many ways - economically, culturally, socially. The traditional fabric of Native communities changed - where once the community had been more important than the individual, Native Alaskans were now facing the American dream - a dream which for some would come true, whilst for others it would prove to be a nightmare.

It is almost certain, that Alaska's Natives could not have negotiated themselves a better deal - neither in 1971 nor in the years hence. It is equally true that ANCSA has given the Native population a sizeable economic stake in the development of Alaska's resources. But neither ANCSA nor any other American legislation has ever given indigenous people the right to choose for themselves as to whether or when any development should take place - therein lies the fatal flaw of ANCSA.
Seen from the point of view of many Inupiat Eskimos, the moral and philosophical issues are simple - the land is theirs, the oil is theirs, and the only morally and historically correct course would have been to grant the indigenous people of Alaska total sovereignty to all of the land. Of course such a conclusion to the Native lands claims would - in 1971 or today - be politically and constitutionally impossible. 
The US has never removed a star from its flag, and such a course of action would never have been under discussion. So in the end ANCSA had to be a compromise - and as such - would be doomed to have its failures as well as its successes.
The important issue for Native Alaska is to recognize such failings for what they are - the shortcomings of a solution which could never fairly address the fundamental issues to the satisfaction of the population of Alaska - Native and non-native. Those Native organizations which have done well since 1971, are those whose regions creation had blessed with natural wealth, and whose leadership have understood how best to harness the wealth and exploit it politically and economically.
 
The greatest impact of ANCSA lies therefore in the way it changes Native society, replacing traditional values and social structures with American or Western industrial ways of organizing society, managing the land, harvesting the wealth and governing its people. Most Americans or Westerners would argue that their system is the best that mankind has ever evolved for managing the affairs of man - and in their eyes, ANCSA was the right course to follow. 
Such views of course deny the simple truth that whatever the virtues of the Western world, it was a question which the Native population should have decided for themselves. This is the dilemma of indigenous people throughout the world.
As ANCSA divided the Native population - into have's and have-not's, employed and unemployed, rich and poor, rural and urban, educated or uneducated - their perceptions and stories of life since ANCSA have diverged - it depends on who you ask, and from which perspective you are asking.
 
Episode 4 - so far the last film in the "Native Experience" series - does not attempt to tell a single chronological story - instead we examine some of the aspects of development since ANCSA - from the immediate boom impact of the construction of the Trans Alaska Pipeline, to the social and economic changes which followed and the impact of these on different communities. Finally we examine the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the lessons which can be learnt from the disaster.
 
Episode 4 is entitled "The Last Place on Earth" - inspired by the title song which was written by Mike Faubion. For me the title represents the paradox of the development of Alaska - Natives and non-natives pursuing wealth and progress, but both disenchanted by what they find - for many outsiders, work in Alaska was the quest for wealth, for which hard work away from home in an even harder climate was the price - for many Natives, participating in the construction boom gave immediate material gains, but at the cost of changing their homeland forever.
The following participated with their interview in this episode -

Morris Thompson
Denny Denbrock
Dermot Cole
Willie Hensley
Jack Roderick
Gary Attla
John Shively
Charles Brower
Elise Patkotak
Jim Beckham
Ron Brower
Gary Harrison

The number of non-native participants in this episode, compared with the foregoing episodes, illustrates the degree to which the demographics of Alaska have changed in recent years - whilst certain political issues undeniably polarize Alaskans on a native / non-native fault line (or at least an urban / rural one) - it is true that the native and non-native population groups - especially in the rural areas typically continue to live and work in harmony.
As the closing narration of the film suggests, "the white population, many born and bred in Alaska, were also working to create progress without obliterating the land they loved." 
For many non-natives, Alaska is their home, and has been for several generations. This was undeniably "part of the clock" which ANCSA could not wind back.
 
This film makes a valuable contribution towards documenting the history of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act and is recommended viewing for Native and non-native audiences alike.
 

 

This programme is dedicated
to the memory of
Athabascan leader, Morris Thompson

 
(Producers note: The dedication of this episode is particularly important to me, as Morris Thompson was one of the first Native leaders whom I met with in 1997, and whose guidance, help and friendship sustained me on many occasions throughout my filming travels in Alaska. His tragic death in January 2000 was a great loss for all Alaskans.)
 
  Latest update: 19/11/2009 16:42AR

© 1997 - 2009 Channel 6 Television Denmark